The Center The Sun:
1.
The suns chemical reactions are varied and I
feel that they are somewhat different than generally
accepted and I am in the process of detailing my
theories and I will in time post them here.
2.
I feel
the mass of the solar system is not 98% in the sun and
2% in the planets as greatly accepted. In my
calculations the sun actually has only about 52% of the
mass of our solar system and the planets about another
2%. The other 46% of the mass is divided between the .1%
in the Asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter and 46% in
the Kuiper Belt and Oort Cloud that take in the
multitude of minor planets Pluto and beyond. Much of
this 46% of the solar system in the Kuiper Belt and Oort
Cloud, in time through material collisions will have a
change of speed and for billions of years this mass has
been and will be falling inward being collected by the
inner objects in the solar system, the planets and the
sun. The sun will collect ~95% of these objects.
Some of this matter is hydrogen and helium that helps
fuel the sun but all of his mass makes the inner planets
and sun grow in size. This is why all of the planets are
now moving closer to the sun since they are increasing
in mass. Ordinarily if planets were captured by a
gravitational center object like the sun a percentage of
them would have an increasing orbital size and now none
of the planets do. Another calculation is that Saturn
Uranus and Neptune are in distance 9.5, 19.2 to 30.1 AU
respectfully from the sun. This makes the Kuiper Belt
and the Oort cloud influential on their orbit and mass
calculations. If you were to draw a cone from these
planets to the portion of the Kuiper Belt and Oort Cloud
equaling 46% of the mass of the solar system that is
closer than the sun to these planets the calculations of
their mass changes because of the gravitational pull of
this mass.
Shown are the known objects in the Kuiper belt
again I feel this is less than 1% of them. Notice how
about 27% of these objects are closer to Uranus and
Neptune than the sun. These objects greatly affect the
calculations of gravitational pull away from the sun and
effect the calculated mass of these planets. This is why
as you read further I have the solid mass calculated
that I am sure is there. The Kuiper Belt as shown starts
at 20 AU and goes to 50 AU The Oort cloud is from 100 to
1000 AU
a.
Collecting these objects will cause the sun to grow
sufficiently in size so that the fission fusion reaction
from the finite quantity of hydrogen and helium gases on
the surface will become thin enough that it will not
sustain the fission fusion reaction cycle. Without the
surface coverage of these fission reactions the
compaction of the gaseous materials below this reaction
will diminish causing the fusion reactions to decrease
except those toward the center creating iron. The sun
has a lot of iron now but the production of more with
the stability of iron will dead end some of the reaction
processes. The lack of surface fission and its related
compaction below will cause the materials on the sun to
expand and with only gravity affecting these materials
will allow the sun to expand and become a red giant.
The other nuclear reactions that furnace the center also
decrease because of compression differences from the
lessioning fission reactions on the surface and the half
life decay of some of these materials.
b.
The
present thought that the sun runs out of fissionable
hydrogen and fails to maintain its present energy
balance I feel is false. The fusion fission reaction
cycle is a continuous cycle. The rogue stars believed to
be over 13.8 billion years old are still going because
the contributing materials in orbit outside them is
finite and therefore, not enough material has been
contributing to their mass to make them grow in size
beyond their surfaces hydrogen helium fission fusion
reaction cycle. The sun is presently considered to
be 92.1% hydrogen and 7.8% helium therefore all other
elements comprise less than 0.3%. In my theory the sun
is
more than 13% Iron and heavier materials
including Lanthanoids & Actinoids and they are in
conditions toward the core of the sun that allow them to
be in a more stable state. Endothermic fusion also
happens deep inside the sun. When the smaller suns
increase their iron content through the fusion process,
they have their iron content increase. These extreme
pressures and temperatures tend to stabilize these
materials half-life's. Explained in more detail later.
When a sun lacks sufficient fissionable hydrogen to
cover it's surface for this compression it becomes a red
giant. Then the internal nuclear reactions slow because
the materials half lives cycle start counting down
because of the lack of the stabilizing heat and
pressure. The sun then looses much of its surface
materials when a red giant so, it's remaining objects of
heavy mass then implode to a white dwarf because of the
lack of activity and heat. Eventually the half life
process of this much smaller exposed central mass allows
the white dwarf to literally go out.
c.
Our big bang came
from the compaction of the mass of the hundreds of
billions of Galaxies compacted into Galactic sized
Black Holes or GBH. These "GBH" black holes are composed
of the mass of a galaxy. These
GBH's then collide with each other and when several
hundred billion of these come together they finally
compact the mass in the middle so that even quarks that
pass through the spaces in normal black holes are
stopped.
A big bang occurs
when enough GBH's come together to compress the center
so that the mass of the atoms in the middle are
compacted to stop objects such as a quarks. This quark
being 99.999% energy when stopped becomes mass according
to Einstein. This new center mass objects by their
volume creates a compressing outward ripple affect
around it. This creates a growing ballooning type
structure from this new mass.
In other words
these new objects in the center then causes others
around it to convert from energy to mass in a circle
like an expanding balloon. These new central objects
eventually return to energy as it compresses the mass
throughout the Big Bang sized Black Hole or BBBH. This
final expansion allows the center to eventually relax
allowing the quarks and other energy particles to return
to their stable energy state.
The energy of gravity in this cycle also turns
into mass and becomes part of the big bang. This affects
time according to Einstein allowing the big bang
expansion to occur faster than the speed of light.
At the time of a Big Bang
time is not a constant standing
back and watching from our frame of reference a Star
Trek warp 11 would appear to be happening. I believe
controlling the force of gravity is the key to the time
continuum; therefore, speed and even the speed of light
is relative in a Big Bang. Time would literally stop
during the the preliminary zero gravity stage of the Big
Bang. Remember that black holes stars and other mass
that was inbound toward the BBBH and close before it
triggered would be consumed but inbound mass still out
several millions light years would trigger normal
reactions within and stabilize the now expanding BB
material. Also remember even now we still have material
going the wrong way in our expanding universe and stars
that calculate as being older than our present big bang.
d.
These Quarks may go through a mass cycle that causes
them to become the illusive Higgs particle that expands
like an expanding balloon. This stopping of a particle
like a quark happens only in a BBBH.
e.
A big bang is not an explosion as we know it. It
is simply an instantly increasing ring from the center
of a Big Bang sized Black Hole or BBBH. This growing
object continues until it has expanded through most of
the entire mass of the BBBH until the pressures toward
the surface have made it increase to an object of
thousands of light years in size so it becomes greater
in diameter faster than our reference of the speed of
light. This is a circumstance where speed, space and
time are not functioning in a way we could calculate
using our frame of referrence. When the big bang
occurs there are still objects like stars and black
holes that are inbound. These objects then are the seeds
that start the processes of galaxies again as presumed
by my computer model of XXXXXX to be illustrated.
3.
In our solar system all of
the planets orbits are moving closer to the sun as time
passes. This cannot be just by accident. Planets that
are produced and captured to orbits by the sun should be
about 50% captured in a way that their orbits would be
expanding in size moving further away from the sun every
year, the other about 50% would have orbits shrinking in
size falling inward toward the sun. If in fact the mass
of the sun is decreasing as others assume and therefore,
having less gravitational pull most of the orbits of the
planets would be after billions of years be increasing
in size. If the mass of the sun is increasing its
increased gravitational pull would be stronger causing
the planets even the ones that had originally an
increasing orbital size to then have smaller orbits
eventually falling inward as is the case. Also the
planets are receiving more mass every year from these
outer regions. Equally important I agree the reactions
creating the particles involved in the solar wind are
decreasing the mass of the sun, however the net balance
is an increase in mass caused by objects falling inward
from the Asteroid belt, the Kuiper Belt and the Ort
cloud. Remember I feel about 52% of the solar system
still lies in these areas and is over billions of years
inbound toward the sun. People tell me look at the
distance of these objects. I tell them look at the time
involved. This has been happening for the past 5 billion
years and will happen for the next 5 billion years. Many
of these objects are at a distance from the sun and at a
point in space where the gravity between the objects has
a strong enough influence to enhance these collisions.
An object that is knocked outward at the same speed it
was traveling or even more loses centrifugal rotational
momentum and is also doomed to be inward bound.
a.
Gaseous planets have a solid core that is nuclear and
very hot. This heat causes layers just above the molten
core to be a very hot low density layer that is hot
enough and thin enough to cloak and disguise the density
of the core. The atmosphere above this core and its
extremely hot low density envelope is thick enough while
being so far from the sun it receives very little solar
heat radiation that it is insulated from our knowledge
and would be relatively cold. However this extremely low
density extremely hot layer just above the nuclear core
and extending for several thousands of miles balances
and offsets the cores density in calculations.
Also I believe orbital
centrifugal calculations have to take into consideration
the Kuiper Belts and Oort clouds mass in calculating
their gravitational pull on these planets. Again close
to 46% of our solar systems mass are in these outer
layers and therefore 20%+ of the of the solar systems
mass is closer to these planets outside their orbits
than the sun is at the center of their orbit.
4.
Our 13.8 billion year old big bang is just one of many
such systems. Some of the stars that are older than our
13.8 billion year old universe and are unexplainable in
our present thinking are explainable by their coming in
as strays from one of the many other big bang cycles.
Most of the other big bang cycles that contribute and
affect our system epicenter are billions of years older
than ours so their "GBH" are what is left and they are
inbound toward the gravitational center of our Big Bang.
Many of these GBH black holes are now within our system
but the majority are incoming but still outside our 13.8
billion year old system. The gravitational pull from
these objects that are outside our 13.7 billion year
universe are causing our universe to expand outward ever
faster toward them. These objects are far enough away
that visible light would not have reached them; however,
gravity is affecting them. The affects of gravity takes
place between these objects moving towards each other
even if these objects are far enough apart that light
would not have had time to travel between them.
Therefore gravity between two objects will allow them to
affect each other even if their distances are greater
than energy moving at the speed of light would allow
them to affect each other. Therefore the affects of
gravity takes place faster than the speed of light.
Gravity is definitely
not
the weaker force as it is often described.
The only items that
truly have infinity are space and time. There are an
infinite number of big bangs in space and most of the
matter of one big bang is shared with others. The
gravity of one big bang draws the materials from all the
others in the area. Our big bang is now expanding more
rapidly toward the gravitational epicenter of the
neighboring big bangs. There are no logical mathematical
or practical boundaries to space. I find the concept is
easy to comprehend without boundaries. It is just the
limitations of our minds that has to put a boundary on
space and time.
a.
The thought that our big bang developed from a point of
singularity I feel is incorrect. Every BBBH comes from
the accumulation of mass sufficient to stop the object
like a quark. There would still be objects inbound at
the time of the big bang. These objects if close enough
would be consumed by the expanding mass and energy for
instance within a 10 million light year ring. Objects
inbound from outside that ring would still exist and be
inbound. Anything close to that ring would be
clobbered by the expanding mass.
b.
Big
bangs are a very controlled uniform occurrence without
irregularities in temperature like in a normal chemical
explosion with hot spots and temperature variations. The
conversion from energy to matter in this extremely rapid
balloon like expansion would release energy especially
when inside the ballooning conversion the matter would
be reverting to energy. This exchanging process would be
uniform and totally different than any other reaction.
Light or other anomalies would not be omitted from a big
bang because of the gravitational pull would be in
quantum multiples of even a regular black hole until the
Big Bang occurs. At the time of the Big Bang gravity and
time stop; therefore, without gravitational energy and
time as a reference the expansion until it becomes
stable with the return of time and gravity are difficult
to calculate until it is essentially over. This is
why much more mass is distributed further from the big
bangs epicenter than can be calculated using our normal
frame of referrence.
c.
Big
bangs are occurring at different intervals in the newly
described much larger universe but are separated by a 30
billion light years distance or greater. Therefore our
galaxies are accelerating away from the center of our
last big bang toward the incoming "GBH" mass from other
big bangs. This causes an exchange of mass between big
bangs. By the time these objects arrive close to our
proximity they are of an age that they are mainly galaxy
size black holes "GBH's". Their numbers are great and
their mass is of such immensity that they greatly affect
the calculations of the mass in our system. This is the
mistake and answers misteak of black energy.
Our galaxies will become part of and increase
their acceleration toward other systems big bang
epicenters. Their Galaxy size black holes are and will
continue to come into the center of ours. In repetition
for accentuation our mass will continue to increase
acceleration into numerous surrounding other big bang
systems and their mass is and will continue to be
incoming to ours. When enough mass again arrives to
cause a black hole of the accumulated size to stop a
quark another Big Bang it will take place.
4. Presently the theory is that black
matter comprises much of the unknown mass of the
universe. Actually much of that unaccounted for mass are
black holes coming in from other big bangs in other
words many are the accumulation of a galaxies mass from
another universes big bangs. The 13% of stars that is
not the hydrogen presently assumed but iron and heavier
nuclear elements of the spectrum. This central core when
of sufficient size is what starts the stars reactions of
fission and fusion on thye surface.
4.5
The suns
layers have a fusion fission reaction combination. For
the cycle to last billions of years the hydrogen fission
reaction gives off energy and the helium producing
fusion reaction below this pressure and heat has a net
consumption of energy. This conservation of energy cycle
production and consumption would last almost
indefinitely. The fission reaction on the surface of the
sun compresses the gas below it and with its
temperatures and pressures below this fission reaction
combined with the forces of the enormous gravity from
the suns mass cause the fusion to helium. Part of the
heat for this reaction is from the nuclear internal
furnace not presently fully appreciated in the equation.
This fusion reaction is endothermic (consumes energy);
therefore, the billions being spent on energy production
from fusion, thinking it is exothermic (produces energy)
I question. True the actual reaction of fusion gives off
energy but it is less that the energy consumed to get
the reaction to that point. I feel this is the reason
25+ years of research and experimentation has not
produced the desired results. I am finishing some papers
on my calculations and will post them on this website.
5.
Energy
with a certain frequency is the answer to bending space
and time. It is the controlling force of gravity. It is
the key to bending space and time and; therefore, it is
easy to appear to be traveling faster than the speed of
light. The amount of energy needed to accomplish this is
a manageable quantity and not the huge amounts
speculated. The frequencies involved in this
process are of such a short cycle they are not presently
obtainable. For instance the amount of energy to
presently levitate a small object is immense because we
are using an harmonic of the actual frequency.
6. The planets with an iron core like
Mars that had volcanoes and a hot liquid core like earth
that are now dead and solid without the liquid core are
believed to have become cooler just because of their
smaller size and natural cooling. Actually they are
cooler because of their original composition. When a
planet is formed it is a composite of the objects that
come together. The heavier chemicals like iron and
elements in the radioactive spectrum wind up in the
middle of the molten impact mass. In other words the
heavier mass goes to the center of an object involved in
a collisions that superheats the objects to a molten
state. This heavier mass if it is sufficient to create a
thermo nuclear furnace that churns to create the
regulated heat that has kept this planet with a molten
core for the last 5 billion years. I am doing the math
to be inserted later that will show that this planet is
not just cooling because of size over the past 5 billion
years. I will show the math to support my claim that it
takes the calculation of half life of the radioactive
core to have these calculations time out correctly. The
enormous size of these nuclear furnaces are controlled
by a churning action that regulates the rate of reaction
much like controlling the rods in a nuclear reactor.
Mars for instance had a sufficient nuclear core that
churned to create a regulated reaction. when much of
this core reached its half life the churning of this
core slows. At some point the controlling rod action
churning the core slows and then the central mass
becomes thicker. This churning action is a nuclear
reaction controlling action. It controls like moving the
rods in a reactor. The larger the thermonuclear core the
more fluid and less viscous it becomes and the better it
regulates itself. I am positive that one of
the areas on Mars that appears to have exploded was not
a meteor crater but was a nuclear explosion and time
will bear this out. Again when this slowing of the
molten core happens the cores movements can not hold
these reactions in check and then it will blow in a
large explosive reaction. The rapid volatile churning of
the core is like moving the rods in and out of a
reactor. When the viscosity increases it is like having
the rods stuck in one central position. If that position
holds the nuclear mass tightly together the impending
reaction is explosive. Mars had one of these dying core
explosions that then terminated the molten core. The
planet then looses its magnetic field, it atmosphere,
its water, and shield from the solar wind. The smaller
objects in the universe like small planets and moons do
not capture a sufficient quantity of the denser nuclear
incoming objects and therefore had no thermonuclear
core.
All planets that have
had a molten core like earth, and including the earth,
in time will pass through this stage and die. (loosing
all surface life!)
Some planets like
Jupiter, Saturn and Uranus with their very large
reactive cores and distances from the sun may outlast
the sun present stage and exist with their magnetic
fields into the suns red giant phase. All planets on the
central magnetic plane with the sun have had strong
molten cores and magnetic fields in the beginning. The
ones with the strongest most fluid cores even today are
the gas covered giants. These cores are large and so
reactive and molten that there is no solid surface. The
huge gaseous blankets of these giants hold the heat on
the surface of the molten cores.
7. All of the larger objects in our
solar systems have a much rapider rate of spin than
ours. The Liquefied molten nuclear centers spin much
faster than the surface gases. The suns surface as it
appears to us spins at an average rate is rate of 24.6
days. The suns diameter is 109 earths; therefore, the
surface rate of travel is about 3,699 km per hour or
2,119 mph. Jupiter's surface rotates in 0.41 days so its
surface spins at 14,973 mph. The cores on the gas giants
are a liquid molten center with no solid surfaces. I
believe it will be determined that these very active
cores have a very hot gaseous less dense insulating
atmospheres just above. Then above that the atmospheres
become cooler and more dense. Some of these higher
layers are cool enough to become liquid and therefore,
the activity of a more dense gas or even liquid
atmospheres is free to become more violent because of
the extreme temperatures below without a solid
insulating surface. This makes both sides of these
atmospheres virtually friction free. Since these
atmospheres are so thick that the surfaces receive very
little heat from the core. These planets are so far from
the sun they receive very little surface heating.
Imagine an atmosphere with a extremely hot internal heat
source and a very cold exterior without any friction
surfaces. No wonder the storms on Jupiter last for years
with no friction from external temperature variations.
Earth now has a magnetic vortex under the Atlantic
ocean. The core on Jupiter I believe to be about the
size and mass of 6 earths. This gives a very violent
reacting core without a
solid protecting crust layer like ours because the
temperatures keep it all molten allowing a very violent
reaction with the layer just above that remains in a
gaseous state. With Jupiter's core and large gaseous and
liquid portions this would mean the density of 1.33 now
believed is short and should be (2.7g/cm3). This also
justifies the very large magnetic field, 20 times
earth's, around Jupiter. Saturn with a density of .69
has an atmosphere made of hydrogen helium and methane
these light gasses make up for the assumed low density.
However with Saturn's enormous magnetic field I believe
it to have a core 9 times the size of earth with a
density of (2.1g/cm3). The nuclear and iron core however
are proportionately large causing the rapid spin and the
enormous magnetic field. Uranus & Neptune has a cores of
5 & 1 earths respectively with magnetic fields of Uranus
very large with its high nuclear percentage. On the
other hand Neptune's core is smaller without much of the
nuclear furnace who's half life is timing out. Neptune
is also closer to the Kuiper Belt and the Ort cloud and
therefore much of its acquired mass in the beginning
lacked the heavier elements. I believe most of the mass
in these areas lack iron and the heavier elements. The
Ort cloud is in a random spherical ball showing no
magnetic tendencies just influenced by gravitational
pull. The outer planets spin rate has to do with the
large size, volatility and actions of their nuclear
cores. Once these cores half life's time out they
are in the process of slowing down. If you take a
nuclear core that is large enough so that it is hot
enough to spin very actively it eliminates the cores
solid portion and the gaseous portion is large enough
with enough volume to be cold on top 5 to 30 (AU) from
the sun. The large dense atmosphere above the core
shields the heat of the core from the upper atmosphere
so its lower temperature is deceiving. The specific
gravity of Jupiter is 2.7 not 5.52 as it is on earth but
definitely not the 1.33 as generally assumed. These gas
giants with their large very hot nuclear reactive cores
have a gaseous very low friction layer just above the
cores that allows the cooler liquid layers to float
above. Imagine an almost frictionless liquid and gaseous
layer spinning just above the cores faster rate of spin.
The different spin rates of these layers justifies the
violent storms. Earth with its solid and cool liquid
water surface has a more controlled minor atmosphere.
The say the sun has a density of 1.410 but my
calculations have it about 3.23 about 3 times the
density. "Solar energy is created deep within the
core of the Sun. It is here that the temperature
(15,000,000 C; 27,000,000 F) and pressure (340 billion
times Earth's air pressure at sea level) is so intense
that nuclear reactions take place''*.. The first
layer of the suns surface is hydrogen much in a
extremely hot low density state, just below is of
fission and fusion. The hydrogen being compressed
below by the surface fission reaction temperatures
pressures and gravity into helium takes in the next
layered portion of the sun. When a sun explodes in a
supernova it has a high percentage of Hydrogen Oxygen
and water. All planets have been bombarded with an over
abundance of these items. The core of the sun has iron
and the radioactive heavy elements. The planets that are
through chance and collisions large enough and comprised
of a sufficient quantity of these heavy elements to have
their half lives keep the cores liquid for billions of
years and are in the habitable zone of their star have
the opportunity for intelligent life. For instance Mars
was short of these nuclear heavy elements so the liquid
core was reduced and most of the molten core has
solidified as to loose its magnetic field. When the
magnetic field is gone so goes most of the atmosphere
liquid water etc. because of the solar wind.
8. When you recalculate the masses of of the
objects in the solar system they balance. The trillions
of objects in the Main Asteroid Belt, Kuiper belt and
Oort cloud comprising about half of the solar system are
interesting to calculate. These objects including Pluto,
Charon and others even larger without molten cores and
magnetic fields are randomly scattered in orbits not
adhering to a one plane concentration. Therefore,
collisions between these objects is often and therefore,
many with reduced speed do not maintain orbit and slowly
fall inward toward the sun. Many of these objects
encounter the gravities of the gas giants and are
collected by them. Many of the Oort cloud objects are
water ice and have contributed to the composition of all
planets and their moons. Only the objects with
sufficient magnetic fields have kept these gasses and
liquid water.
* Graphs and pictures below are from
NASA
The
following table lists statistical information for the
Sun and planets:
More information is available by going to their links.
Again as with the sun I believe it is less than half of
the mass of the solar system not 98% as stated. Also the
computations of the mass of the outer planets does not
take into calculation the fact that a portion of half of
the mass of the solar system is closer to the in the
Kuiper Belt and Oort cloud.
|
Distance
(AU)
|
Radius
(Earth's) |
Mass
(Earth's) |
Rotation
(Earth's) |
# Moons |
Orbital
Inclination |
Orbital
Eccentricity |
Obliquity |
Density
(g/cm3) |
|
Sun |
0 |
109 |
332,800 |
25-36* |
9 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
1.410 |
|
Mercury |
0.39 |
0.38 |
0.05 |
58.8 |
0 |
7 |
0.2056 |
0.1 |
5.43 |
|
Venus |
0.72 |
0.95 |
0.89 |
244 |
0 |
3.394 |
0.0068 |
177.4 |
5.25 |
|
Earth |
1.0 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1 |
0.000 |
0.0167 |
23.45 |
5.52 |
|
Mars |
1.5 |
0.53 |
0.11 |
1.029 |
2 |
1.850 |
0.0934 |
25.19 |
3.95 |
|
Jupiter |
5.2 |
11 |
318 |
0.411 |
16 |
1.308 |
0.0483 |
3.12 |
1.33 |
|
Saturn |
9.5 |
9 |
95 |
0.428 |
18 |
2.488 |
0.0560 |
26.73 |
0.69 |
|
Uranus |
19.2 |
4 |
17 |
0.748 |
15 |
0.774 |
0.0461 |
97.86 |
1.29 |
|
Neptune |
30.1 |
4 |
17 |
0.802 |
8 |
1.774 |
0.0097 |
29.56 |
1.64 |
|
Pluto |
39.5 |
0.18 |
0.002 |
0.267 |
1 |
17.15 |
0.2482 |
119.6 |
2.03 |
Planetary Magnetic Fields, Length of
day, and diameter.
ALS als als disease als symptoms,
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Lou Gehrigs disease
Science Forum, scienceforum, fasciculation's, solar,
Magnetism, Fusion, Fision, big bang ALS ALS Amyotrophic
lateral sclerosis, fasciculations, Science Forum,
scienceforum, fascic's, fasciculation's, solar,
Magnetism, Fusion, Fision, big bang ALS ALS ALS ALS als
Sun Solar System, Kuiper Belt, Oort Cloud, hydrogen
Helium fusion fision Big Bang Black Hole energy big bang
Sun Solar System, Kuiper Belt, Oort Cloud, hydrogen
Helium fusion fision ALS ALS als Big Bang Black Hole
energy big bang als ALS ALS als disease als symptoms,
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Lou Gehrigs disease
Science Forum, scienceforum, fasciculation's, solar,
Magnetism, Fusion, Fision, big bang ALS als ALS Science
Forum, scienceforum, alsforum, Celestial Science,
Astronomy Science Forum, Celestial Science, Astronomy
Science Forum, scienceforum, alsforum, Celestial
Science, Astronomy
